For decades, the U.S. national debt has grown, and so too has the stock market. This apparent correlation raises a compelling question: is it mere coincidence, or do rising levels of debt and the stock market’s upward trajectory share a causal relationship? Could the stock market have been even higher if the U.S. had borrowed more aggressively, or would fiscal restraint have propelled stocks to greater heights? The answer is nuanced and depends on the interplay between debt, economic growth, global factors, and investor confidence.
The Parallel Growth of Debt and the Stock Market
Economic Growth: The Common Thread
Both the stock market and national debt tend to grow over time due to overall economic expansion. The U.S. economy grows as productivity improves, populations expand, and technology advances. Companies generate higher profits, which drive stock market growth, while the government often borrows to finance investments that support this expansion—whether it’s infrastructure, defense, or social programs.
In short, debt and the stock market aren’t directly tied, but they’re both closely linked to the economy’s broader growth trajectory.
Debt-Fueled Stimulus and Market Performance
There’s a more direct connection when national debt increases during periods of economic distress, like recessions or crises. During such times, the government often borrows heavily to provide stimulus, support consumer spending, and stabilize financial markets.
For example, the unprecedented debt increase during the COVID-19 pandemic enabled massive fiscal stimulus packages that supported millions of households and businesses. This not only prevented a deeper economic contraction but also contributed to rapid recovery in corporate earnings, fueling stock market growth.
Monetary Policy and Low Interest Rates
Rising national debt often coincides with loose monetary policies. Central banks such as the Federal Reserve intervene to keep borrowing costs manageable, either by buying government bonds or keeping interest rates low. These lower rates tend to make equities more attractive than bonds for investors, as bonds offer lower returns in a low-rate environment.
As such, increasing debt indirectly supports the stock market by creating favorable investment conditions for equities.
The Role of the Dollar and Global Investment Flows
The Dollar as the Global Reserve Currency
A key advantage that allows the U.S. to sustain higher levels of debt while keeping its stock market strong is the U.S. dollar’s status as the world’s reserve currency. Central banks and investors around the globe hold large reserves of dollars, and international trade is often conducted in dollars. This creates constant demand for U.S. assets, including Treasury bonds and equities.
This dynamic gives the U.S. extraordinary flexibility. The government can borrow more because it knows there will always be buyers for its debt, while corporations benefit from easier access to global capital. The constant demand for dollar-denominated investments supports both the U.S. bond market and the stock market.
Global Instability Pushes Investors to U.S. Assets
During periods of global uncertainty, the U.S. benefits from its perception as a safe haven. Economic turmoil, geopolitical risks, or financial instability in other parts of the world often push investors to allocate funds to U.S. stocks and bonds. This inflow of foreign investment drives up stock prices while simultaneously keeping borrowing costs low for the U.S. government.
For example, during the European debt crisis or periods of emerging market volatility, the relative stability of the U.S. economy and its capital markets attracted international capital. This “flight to safety” reinforces the strength of U.S. equities and helps fund the national debt.
A Virtuous Cycle of Debt and Growth
This dynamic creates a self-reinforcing cycle:
- Global investors flock to U.S. markets, driving up stock prices and keeping interest rates low.
- A rising stock market boosts corporate earnings and consumer wealth, supporting economic growth.
- A strong economy allows the U.S. to borrow even more, increasing the national debt while maintaining investor confidence.
In effect, the dollar’s global dominance and the strength of U.S. capital markets allow the U.S. to maintain a larger debt load without suffering the financial consequences that might plague other nations.
Would the Stock Market Have Grown Faster With Even More Debt?
What if the U.S. had borrowed even more aggressively over the years? While it’s tempting to assume that more borrowing and stimulus could drive the stock market higher, it’s not guaranteed. Here’s why:
Short-Term Growth Potential
More debt, if used productively (e.g., for infrastructure or education), can stimulate the economy by creating jobs and increasing output. Such spending has a multiplier effect, raising corporate revenues and stock prices. For example, the rapid response during the COVID-19 pandemic shows how aggressive borrowing helped stabilize and even propel the stock market to new highs.
Long-Term Risks
However, borrowing excessively carries risks. A rapid debt buildup without accompanying economic growth could stoke inflation, lead to higher interest rates, or trigger investor concerns about fiscal sustainability. If markets begin to question the government’s ability to manage its debt, they might lose confidence, leading to stock market turbulence.
While faster debt growth might support short-term stock market gains, the risk of undermining long-term stability could ultimately outweigh the benefits.
Would Less Debt Have Helped?
Conversely, what if the U.S. had borrowed less? Would the stock market have performed better, worse, or stayed the same? The impact depends largely on what would replace government borrowing in the economy.
Reduced Demand and Investment
A slower rise in debt could mean less government spending on programs that stimulate demand, such as infrastructure, research, or unemployment benefits. This reduced fiscal support might slow economic activity and corporate profit growth, potentially weakening the stock market.
Lower Interest Rates and Investor Confidence
On the flip side, less borrowing might reduce pressure on interest rates, leaving more room for private sector investment. Additionally, markets often view fiscal restraint positively, as it suggests a lower risk of inflation or financial instability. This could boost investor confidence and equity prices in the long run.
However, sharp cuts to debt without suitable private-sector investment could result in a sluggish economy, diminishing the very corporate earnings that drive stock performance.
Correlation or Causation?
Correlation Through Third Factors
Debt and stock market growth are often driven by third factors like economic expansion, central bank policies, or crisis responses. For example, the Federal Reserve plays a central role in supporting both government debt markets and stock prices by lowering interest rates and providing liquidity during downturns.
The Nature of Debt Matters
Not all debt is created equal. Borrowing to invest in projects that improve long-term productivity (e.g., roads, education) likely supports economic growth and the stock market more effectively than borrowing to fund short-term consumption or service existing debt.
Market Confidence Is Key
Ultimately, the connection between debt and stock markets hinges on investor confidence. If markets believe that borrowing is sustainable and serves a productive purpose, stocks are likely to benefit. If not, rising debt could become a drag on performance.
Conclusion: A Balancing Act
The relationship between the U.S. national debt and the stock market reflects a balance between short-term stimulus and long-term sustainability. On one hand, rising debt can stimulate economic activity, provide liquidity, and support corporate earnings—bolstering stock prices. On the other hand, excessive debt risks inflation, higher interest rates, and eroding confidence, which could weigh on markets.
The role of the dollar as a global reserve currency and the appeal of U.S. assets as a safe haven amplify this relationship. Global instability and demand for dollar-denominated investments not only drive stock prices higher but also create a self-reinforcing cycle of strong growth, rising debt, and sustained investor confidence.
Could the stock market have been even higher with faster debt growth? Potentially, but the risks of overheating or undermining market confidence might have tempered gains. Would the market have thrived with less debt? Possibly, if fiscal restraint was paired with robust private-sector investment, but reduced public spending could also slow economic growth and corporate profits.
At the core of this debate is the question of how effectively debt is used. When leveraged strategically, it can spur growth that benefits both the economy and markets. But like any powerful tool, its misuse can lead to long-term consequences that investors—and taxpayers—are left to bear.
Related Reading: