This is a fictional thought piece — a speculative scenario exploring how events might unfold if Europe, the UK, and the U.S. took very different approaches to central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). It is not a prediction, and it is not based on any inside information. All events, timelines, and details are purely imaginary, designed to provoke discussion about the potential consequences of policy choices.
Prologue — 2025
In Washington, a new line was drawn: a retail central bank digital currency (CBDC) would not be built. The executive order was blunt—no federal agency may develop, promote, or issue one. It was sold as a firewall against state overreach, a preemptive defense of financial privacy.
Across the Atlantic, the same technology looked like a lifeline. The EU’s public debt hovered near 90% of GDP (higher in the south), the UK’s around 110%. Tax bases were aging, economies flat, obligations swelling. The digital euro and digital pound weren’t just “modern payments.” They promised control—fine-grained, programmable control over money and, through money, behavior.
Phase One: Soft Seduction (2026–2028)
The CBDCs arrived with velvet gloves:
- “Optional” sign-up.
- Balance caps to “protect the banking system.”
- Offline tap-to-pay to mimic cash.
The billboards said cash for the digital age. The subtext in internal memos said something else: we need to widen the tax net and close the escape hatches.
Meanwhile, escape hatches multiplied. Bitcoin kept rising, insult-proof. Gold sliced past €2,000/oz. Both sat outside policy levers. Officials smiled on camera and rehearsed the same line—for financial stability—while drafting the rules that would clip the exits later.
Everyday tells: tax refunds came a week faster in CBDC; certain benefits, only in CBDC. Merchants got fee holidays—if they accepted CBDC at the till.
Phase Two: Quiet Restrictions (2028–2030)
Then came the “anti-money laundering” turn of the screw:
- Cash purchases of gold over €500 banned without a CBDC-logged identity check.
- Exchanges forced to report all crypto transactions, with automatic CBDC conversion above €1,000.
A Digital Asset Compliance Tax was floated: 20% on gains from “unapproved” digital holdings, payable only in CBDC. Stablecoin issuers faced capital and reserve rules so tight that EU-based shops shut down or moved abroad. It barely mattered; dollar stablecoins slid in through DeFi apps, open-source wallets, and private payment plugins.
Publicly, ministers said crime and terrorism. Privately, treasuries said retention and control. Capital that can leave will leave—unless you make the doors expensive.
Everyday tells: banks began nudging customers to convert foreign e-money to CBDC “for compliance.” A growing number of online shops offered quiet discounts for dollar stablecoin checkout.
Phase Three: The Great Siphon (2030–2032)
Debt crises landed like falling shelves. Italy’s bond market seized. France’s deficit blew past 8% of GDP. UK gilt yields spiked to post-war highs. The IMF’s name reappeared in places once thought immune.
“Optional” CBDC use turned compulsory where the state had leverage:
- Pensions and benefits: CBDC-only.
- Taxes: CBDC-only, with automatic collection features.
- Subsidies and discounts (energy, transport): CBDC-only.
Programmability crept from demo decks into daily life:
- “Solidarity surcharges” deducted from high-balance wallets at month-end.
- Luxury purchases triggered instant VAT uplifts.
- Cross-border payments flagged and delayed for “review.”
Gold went mostly custodial—easier to buy through your CBDC app, impossible to move without leaving a trail. Bitcoin retreated to privacy layers, offshore nodes, and mesh relays. Owning either remained legal, but penalties for “undeclared assets” multiplied.
Everyday tells: an exporter’s supplier payment sat for 72 hours “pending eligibility checks.” A retiree’s winter stipend shrank due to an algorithmic “high energy use” levy.
Phase Four: Public Revolt, Private Flight (2032–2034)
The middle class—squeezed by taxes, inflation, and CBDC rules that changed with the political weather—began reaching for lifeboats.
- Quiet hoards of small gold coins, bought years earlier in cash, resurfaced.
- Bitcoin moved under the radar via privacy wallets and peer-to-peer swaps.
- And most of all, U.S. dollar stablecoins became the everyday escape: predictable, portable, and usable in the same phones and terminals people already had.
In London, freelancers invoiced in USDC to avoid pre-deducted VAT. In Milan, exporters settled with Asian partners in dollar stablecoins to bypass ECB friction. In Lisbon and Lyon, point-of-sale plugins sprouted that took “cards” in front but settled stablecoins behind.
This wasn’t mere evasion. It was monetary migration: daily commerce and savings gliding—quietly, rationally—into digital dollars.
Everyday tells: cafés posted “CBDC accepted” signs as a legal pose, while QR codes on counters routed private payments to stablecoin rails for a 2% discount.
Phase Five: Lockdown Finance (2034–2035)
By now, servicing the debt was the biggest single budget line in multiple European capitals. Austerity was political sulfur. Default hovered like a thunderhead.
The response was inevitable:
- All large domestic transactions had to settle in CBDC.
- Private crypto-to-fiat gateways were banned outright.
- Citizens had to declare foreign digital wallets, with criminal penalties for concealment.
- An “emergency solidarity levy” auto-deducted from CBDC balances above €50,000/£50,000 at quarter-end.
The pitch was moral: protect the social contract. The mechanism was mechanical: programmable, surveilled money that could be sliced, filtered, and seized at the edge.
And yet the leakage persisted. Dollar stablecoins flowed peer-to-peer. Gold crossed borders in coat linings and car doors. Bitcoin threaded through private relays and backyard antennas. The tighter the ring, the more value pressed against it.
Everyday tells: property deals closed in CBDC on paper, then quietly net-settled in stablecoins. Cross-border families used Bitcoin to avoid transfer delays that “accidentally” stretched to a week.
Epilogue — The Hollow Crown (2035)
By 2035, the UK and EU had not formally defaulted. But something fundamental had: trust. The euro and the pound remained legal tender by force, not by affection. For private commerce across much of Europe, the de facto tender was the U.S. dollar—exported through tightly supervised but globally used stablecoins. Gold and Bitcoin became the savings that governments couldn’t trim on a Tuesday.
The lesson was brutal but simple:
You can compel people to hold your currency.
You cannot compel them to trust it.
And once trust dies, no wall is high enough to keep the money from leaving.
CBDCs, sold as anchors of sovereignty, had become engines of fragmentation—pushing citizens into parallel systems and, paradoxically, strengthening the very foreign currency dominance they were meant to resist.
Explore More:
Leave a Reply