There is a possible future in which the U.S., through its financial giants—BlackRock, major banks, and tech platforms—fully embraces blockchain technology to tokenize stocks, real-world assets (RWAs), and even U.S. Treasuries. This financial infrastructure would not be permissionless and decentralized like Bitcoin or Ethereum but rather a set of institutionally controlled blockchains that comply with U.S. regulations while allowing global access to tokenized assets.
This system would serve multiple U.S. interests at once:
- Reinforcing the U.S. dollar’s global dominance by pushing tokenized U.S. Treasuries and dollar-backed stablecoins worldwide.
- Giving banks and asset managers total control over financial transactions on their blockchain networks.
- Creating new revenue streams for Wall Street through tokenized securities and frictionless financialization of all assets.
- Allowing compliance with KYC, AML, and sanctions enforcement, ensuring the U.S. government can still control financial flows.
- Preventing crypto-native risks, such as lost private keys, fraud, and hacks, by integrating institutional safeguards.
However, not everyone will want to play along. While this system would benefit U.S. financial institutions and many global investors, the rest of the world—especially rival geopolitical powers like China and Russia—might actively resist U.S. financial hegemony by either building their own centralized blockchains or embracing decentralized alternatives.
1. The U.S. Plan: Tokenizing Global Finance for Maximum Control
If the U.S. financial system goes all-in on blockchain, it will not look like today’s open-source crypto landscape. Instead, expect highly regulated, permissioned blockchains that integrate tightly with existing financial institutions.
How It Would Work
Tokenizing U.S. Treasuries & Dollar-Backed Stablecoins
- The U.S. already dominates global finance through the Treasury market.
- By putting these assets on institutionally controlled blockchains, anyone worldwide could trade them efficiently.
- This reinforces the dollar’s dominance and allows the U.S. to export its financial system to anyone with a mobile phone.
BlackRock, Banks, and Wall Street Tokenizing RWAs & Stocks
- BlackRock and other financial giants have already started tokenizing assets like real estate, funds, and equities.
- This makes U.S. assets instantly accessible and tradable across the globe, increasing liquidity and financialization.
Centralized Compliance: KYC, Sanctions, and Fraud Prevention
- Unlike Ethereum or Solana, these permissioned blockchains would require full KYC (Know Your Customer) compliance.
- The U.S. would maintain its ability to sanction individuals, companies, or even entire nations by restricting access.
- Scams, hacks, and lost private keys wouldn’t mean lost assets—financial institutions would offer recovery options.
Who Benefits?
U.S. Financial Institutions – Banks and asset managers would profit immensely from transaction fees and asset custody. The U.S. Government – By keeping global finance on a U.S.-controlled system, they extend financial and regulatory control. Retail Investors – More accessibility, safer tokenized assets, and compliance-driven protections.
Who Suffers?
Anyone Seeking Financial Privacy – Every transaction would be tracked and permissioned. Countries That Want Financial Independence – They would be forced to use a U.S.-controlled system or find alternatives. Decentralized Finance (DeFi) – The traditional financial world might see permissionless systems as a threat.
2. Global Resistance: Why the Rest of the World Won’t Accept U.S. Financial Dominance
While the U.S. financial sector could gain massive power through blockchain tokenization, other countries have no interest in letting this happen without a fight.
Key Players Who Will Resist
China: Digital Yuan and State-Controlled Finance
- China already has the digital yuan (CBDC) and is experimenting with blockchain-based financial systems.
- They will not want their economy running on U.S.-controlled infrastructure.
- The Chinese government could force domestic companies to use China-backed blockchain alternatives.
- But their system would likely be closed and centralized, limiting international adoption.
Russia: Crypto for Sanctions Evasion & Financial Sovereignty
- Russia has embraced crypto for international transactions to bypass Western sanctions.
- They might encourage financial systems that don’t require U.S. banking access.
- But like China, Russia may prefer state-controlled solutions rather than true decentralization.
The BRICS Bloc & Developing Nations
- Brazil, India, and South Africa have mixed approaches but generally don’t want U.S. financial control.
- They may experiment with blockchain-based trade but lack a unified alternative.
- A key battleground: Which financial blockchain will emerging economies adopt?
3. The Unexpected Counterattack: Could China & Russia Back DeFi?
If U.S. financial institutions dominate permissioned blockchains, the only way to counteract their influence might be to embrace true decentralization.
Scenario 1: China & Russia Build Their Own Blockchains
- China could create a state-backed alternative to U.S. financial blockchains, but adoption would be limited.
- Russia might try to do the same, but it lacks the tech infrastructure for a serious competitor.
- The problem: Most of the world wouldn’t trust Chinese or Russian-controlled blockchains either.
Scenario 2: China, Russia, and BRICS Nations Support Permissionless DeFi
- To counter U.S. control, they might ironically push for global adoption of Ethereum, Solana, or new decentralized networks.
- If assets are tokenized on open-source blockchains instead of U.S. financial blockchains, the U.S. loses control.
- Instead of fighting tech with tech, they fight centralization with decentralization.
Could we see China and Russia pushing for global DeFi adoption to weaken the U.S.? It’s not as far-fetched as it seems.
4. The Future: A Fragmented or Unified Financial World?
The battle over financial blockchains will determine whether the world’s financial system:
- Becomes more centralized under U.S. control.
- Splits into competing U.S., Chinese, and Russian-controlled networks.
- Moves toward a decentralized, open-source alternative.
The Most Likely Outcome?
- The U.S. will push centralized tokenization aggressively, but global resistance will prevent total dominance.
- China and Russia will likely try and fail to create their own competing systems.
- The real wildcard? If permissionless DeFi gains enough adoption, it could disrupt both sides.
Conclusion: Will Financial Decentralization Win?
The next decade will determine whether finance becomes completely controlled by institutions or whether decentralized networks provide an alternative.
The question remains: Is the future of finance permissioned or permissionless?
The answer will determine who controls the next era of global finance.
Explore More:
Leave a Reply