In crypto, “fixed supply” is often presented as a badge of honor — a guarantee of scarcity, a defense against inflation, and a pillar of sound tokenomics.
But here’s the uncomfortable truth:
Even if a crypto’s total supply is technically fixed, that doesn’t mean its supply is fixed in any meaningful, economic sense — especially if large portions are locked and released to insiders over time.
And more dangerously:
In centralized projects, the supply might not be fixed at all — it can be changed at the stroke of a key.
This post is about both of these threats — and why they’re critical for anyone who cares about scarcity, real value, and not becoming long-term exit liquidity for billion-dollar insider payouts.
✅ What Most People Think “Fixed Supply” Means
Most retail investors hear “fixed supply” and imagine something like Bitcoin:
- A hard cap (e.g. 21 million coins)
- Predictable issuance
- No dilution
- Guaranteed scarcity
But most tokens today only meet this on paper — not in practice.
🧱 Part 1: The Circulating Supply Trap — Unlocks as Hidden Inflation
Most modern crypto projects have a large, fixed supply (say, 100 billion tokens). But only a small portion is made available at launch — typically under 10%.
The rest is:
- Locked for insiders (founders, investors, team, foundation)
- Released monthly over several years — sometimes a decade or more
- Sold over time, depending on liquidity and market conditions
This creates a steady, long-term flood of new supply entering the market — despite no new tokens being minted.
Unlocks are inflation in all but name.
📉 Part 2: How Unlocks Suppress Price — Forever
Here’s the real kicker:
These unlocks don’t just dilute existing holders — they permanently suppress price growth.
Why?
- Every month, more tokens enter the market — regardless of demand.
- Founders and investors typically sell those tokens to fund operations or profit-take.
- This creates perpetual sell pressure, which caps upside.
So even if there’s hype, adoption, or technical progress, the price struggles to rise — because every rally is met with more sell-side volume from insider unlocks.
It’s like running uphill with a boulder tied to your waist — the faster you go, the harder the resistance pulls you back.
💰 Part 3: How Founders Quietly Extract Billions — Over Years
Here’s what most people miss:
This is by design.
These unlock structures allow insiders to offload their tokens slowly, over time — not for a few million, but for potentially billions of dollars.
Let’s break it down:
- A project launches with a $500 million market cap, with only 5% of tokens circulating.
- The team owns 30–50% of total supply, unlocking monthly.
- Even if the price stays flat — or slowly declines — the team can extract massive value over time, simply by selling each unlock into the market.
- They don’t need price to 10x. They just need liquidity and time.
Meanwhile, the market slowly absorbs this insider selling — and retail investors hold the bag, unaware of the scale or duration of these releases.
This is not theoretical. It’s happening right now — across many of the biggest and most hyped Layer 1s, DeFi tokens, and “Web3” projects.
🕳️ Part 4: Most Retail Investors Don’t Understand This — And That’s the Problem
The average retail buyer:
- Sees a low circulating supply and assumes scarcity
- Reads “fixed supply” and assumes there’s no dilution
- Doesn’t check unlock schedules or foundation holdings
- Doesn’t realize that the founders are selling tokens every month into the market they’re buying into
This information asymmetry is critical.
While the public is buying the dream, insiders are quietly monetizing their allocations — month after month, year after year. No dramatic rug-pull. No scandal. Just a steady exit from the back door.
The result? A structural wealth transfer from unaware retail to already-wealthy insiders — often into the hundreds of millions, sometimes billions.
And it all happens under the comforting banner of “fixed supply.”
🚨 Part 5: Even Worse — In Centralized Projects, the Cap Can Be Changed
Everything above assumes the total supply really is fixed.
But in many projects:
- A foundation or multisig controls the token contract
- Governance is insider-dominated or nonexistent
- The supply cap can be changed — and often has been
This means:
- New tokens can be minted at any time
- Caps can be raised for “ecosystem growth” or “community development”
- Investors can be diluted again and again
If a token’s supply is centrally controlled, then its scarcity is a myth — and all claims of “sound tokenomics” are meaningless until proven otherwise.
✅ What You Should Actually Look At
If you’re investing in a token, don’t just check if it has a fixed supply. That’s table stakes. Ask:
- How much is currently circulating?
- Who holds the rest, and how fast is it unlocking?
- What percentage of tokens go to insiders?
- Is the contract immutable, or can supply be changed?
- Is governance decentralized or controlled by a foundation?
- Are unlocks transparent, and do insiders disclose selling?
Because scarcity is not a promise — it’s a discipline.
And most projects don’t have it.
🧩 Final Thought
A token with a fixed supply but massive, long-term unlocks to insiders is not scarce — it just pretends to be.
And a token whose supply can be changed by a small team or multisig is not fixed at all — it’s a centrally managed balance sheet with a token logo on top.
If you don’t want to be exit liquidity, don’t settle for fixed-supply buzzwords.
Understand the flow. Track the unlocks. Follow the power.
Because in this market, those who print and unlock — win.
And those who ignore it — pay for it.
Explore More:
Leave a Reply