In the world of economics, Thier’s Law—a corollary of the well-known Gresham’s Law—states that “good money drives out bad” when both are legal tender and freely circulating. But in a landscape where money is no longer strictly tied to state-backed currencies, could this principle apply to other forms of value exchange, such as cryptocurrency Layer 1 blockchains?
While crypto alt Layer 1s (L1s) like Ethereum, Solana, and Avalanche are not legal tender and will likely never serve as money in the traditional sense, they are critical infrastructure in the decentralized economy. These networks compete fiercely for users, developers, and liquidity. In this context, Thier’s Law can be adapted to explain how “good” Layer 1s might push “bad” ones out of relevance in the ever-evolving crypto ecosystem.
Thier’s Law in Economics vs. Crypto
Thier’s Law operates in the context of legal tender, where bad money (currency with inferior characteristics) tends to disappear from active use as better alternatives become available. In crypto, while no Layer 1 blockchain is mandated as legal tender, we can think of adoption and liquidity as serving a similar function.
Crypto Layer 1s offer users choices, and this freedom creates a competitive dynamic. Some networks emerge as “good Layer 1s,” characterized by scalability, security, decentralization, and low transaction costs. Others are “bad Layer 1s,” plagued by inefficiencies, high fees, or governance issues. Over time, we can observe a migration toward better-performing Layer 1s, where market forces echo the principles of Thier’s Law.
How “Good” Layer 1s Drive Out “Bad”
To understand how this dynamic might play out in the crypto ecosystem, let’s explore a few key factors:
1. Competition in a Free Market
Layer 1 blockchains compete on technical performance, ecosystem robustness, and user experience. For example:
- A “good” Layer 1 may offer fast transaction speeds, low fees, and strong security guarantees.
- A “bad” Layer 1 might suffer from centralization, network outages, or unsustainable fee structures.
In a free-market environment, users, developers, and liquidity naturally migrate toward Layer 1s offering superior value. Over time, “bad” Layer 1s may lose relevance, as their ecosystems fail to sustain meaningful activity.
2. Adoption and Liquidity as Stand-ins for Legal Tender
Legal tender status in traditional money ensures both good and bad currencies circulate. In crypto, adoption and liquidity fill this role. A Layer 1 with high liquidity and robust adoption attracts users and developers, reinforcing its position in the market. Conversely, a network with low adoption struggles to retain relevance, especially if better options are available.
For example, Ethereum’s dominance stems from its first-mover advantage, vibrant developer ecosystem, and large liquidity pools. Meanwhile, smaller Layer 1s with fewer users and weaker ecosystems often struggle to compete.
3. Technological Evolution and Network Effects
In traditional economics, bad money can persist under certain conditions, such as legal mandates. Similarly, “bad” Layer 1s may linger in the crypto ecosystem due to network effects or technological inertia. However, over time, as the market matures, superior platforms have the potential to drive weaker competitors into obscurity.
An excellent example is Ethereum’s ongoing transition to Ethereum 2.0, aimed at addressing scalability and fee challenges. By improving its core technology, Ethereum maintains its position as a “good” Layer 1, pushing weaker competitors to adapt or risk obsolescence.
4. Niche Use Cases for “Bad” Layer 1s
Not all “bad” Layer 1s disappear entirely. Some survive in niche markets where their unique features outweigh their drawbacks. For instance:
- A low-cost Layer 1 might cater to high-frequency, low-value transactions.
- A centralized Layer 1 could appeal to specific industries requiring predictable governance.
These use cases mirror how certain inferior currencies historically persisted in limited contexts.
Implications for the Crypto Ecosystem
Adapting Thier’s Law to the crypto world offers several insights:
1. The Migration to Quality
Users and developers will gravitate toward Layer 1s that strike the right balance between decentralization, scalability, and cost. Over time, weak Layer 1s will lose users and liquidity, effectively being “driven out.”
2. Network Effects Create Persistence
Unlike traditional currency, crypto networks experience powerful network effects. An established Layer 1 like Ethereum may retain dominance even if newer chains offer superior technical features. This inertia slows the pace at which “bad” Layer 1s are driven out.
3. Regulation’s Role
In the absence of regulatory mandates, the crypto market is free to evolve organically. While this promotes innovation, it also allows “bad” Layer 1s to persist longer than they might under stricter oversight. For example, speculative trading or hype cycles can temporarily sustain a weak network.
Conclusion
Thier’s Law may not map perfectly onto the world of Layer 1 blockchains, but its core principles offer a compelling lens for understanding the dynamics of crypto competition. As the industry matures, “good” Layer 1s are likely to outcompete weaker alternatives, driving innovation and improving the overall ecosystem.
However, this process is not instantaneous. Network effects, niche applications, and market hype can sustain “bad” Layer 1s for longer than expected. In the end, the crypto market will continue to reward platforms that offer superior value, security, and scalability—aligning with the spirit, if not the letter, of Thier’s Law.
Explore More:
Leave a Reply