Disclaimer: This website is for informational and entertainment purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Always conduct your own research and consult with financial professionals before making investment decisions (more).
Categories
Bitcoin stablecoins

Are Stablecoins the New Bitcoin? Fulfilling the Promises Bitcoin Can’t

When Bitcoin was introduced in 2009, it promised to revolutionize the financial world. It aimed to “bank the unbanked,” function as “peer-to-peer electronic cash,” offer “instant and almost free transactions,” and be completely “decentralized.” These aspirations inspired a wave of early adopters, who saw Bitcoin as the dawn of a new era in financial sovereignty and freedom.

However, more than a decade later, it’s becoming increasingly clear that Bitcoin has failed to deliver on most of these promises. Instead, an unexpected contender—stablecoins—has emerged to fill the gap. Stablecoins are fulfilling Bitcoin’s initial vision for financial inclusion and efficient payments, and they’re doing so in a way that appeals to the everyday user. The question now is: Are stablecoins the new Bitcoin?


Bitcoin’s Original Promises: Where It Fell Short

1. Bank the Unbanked

One of Bitcoin’s most powerful narratives was its potential to bring financial inclusion to the unbanked—those without access to traditional banking systems. By removing intermediaries, Bitcoin offered a decentralized alternative to store and transfer value.

However, the reality has been quite different. Adopting Bitcoin requires a certain level of technological infrastructure (internet access, smartphones, etc.) and financial literacy. Managing wallets, safeguarding private keys, and navigating volatile prices make Bitcoin inaccessible to many of the people it was supposed to help.

By contrast, stablecoins have made significant strides in banking the unbanked. Built on blockchain technology, stablecoins retain the global accessibility of Bitcoin but remove the barriers of volatility. Moreover, their integration into mobile-friendly apps has made them accessible to millions in regions with limited banking services.


2. Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash

Bitcoin’s white paper, titled “Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System,” set the expectation that it would be used for everyday transactions. Initially, Bitcoin was relatively fast and affordable for small payments. However, as adoption grew, its limitations became apparent. Transactions on the Bitcoin base chain are slow, and fees have skyrocketed, especially during periods of high network congestion.

In contrast, stablecoins are delivering on this promise. Transactions using stablecoins on blockchains like Solana, Polygon, or Binance Smart Chain are fast and cheap, making them ideal for peer-to-peer payments, remittances, and even retail purchases. Their stability also makes them more practical for these use cases.


3. Instant and Almost Free Transactions

Bitcoin transactions on the base layer can take 10 minutes to an hour to confirm, and fees often exceed $5 during periods of high demand. Solutions like the Lightning Network were developed to address these issues, but Lightning has struggled with usability, liquidity, and self-sovereignty challenges.

Stablecoins, on the other hand, excel in this area. Transactions can be completed in seconds or minutes, and fees are often fractions of a cent, depending on the blockchain. For the average user, stablecoins are far more attractive for everyday payments.


4. Decentralization

Bitcoin remains a paragon of decentralization. Its network is powered by thousands of nodes distributed across the globe, making it highly resistant to censorship or single points of failure. However, the ecosystem surrounding Bitcoin—particularly exchanges and mining pools—has introduced elements of centralization.

Stablecoins, while much much less decentralized than Bitcoin, are still more decentralized than traditional fiat currencies. Although most stablecoins are issued by centralized entities (like Tether or Circle), they operate on decentralized blockchain infrastructure. This partial decentralization provides users with some degree of financial sovereignty while retaining the convenience of centralized systems.

And yes: they’ll perhaps descend into CBDCs, which is far far from Bitcoin’s original premise: actually the antithesis of it. Sadly.


The Rise of Stablecoins: Why They’re Winning

1. Ease of Use

Stablecoins have integrated seamlessly into wallets, payment platforms, and decentralized finance (DeFi) applications, making them user-friendly and accessible. Their intuitive interfaces lower the barrier to entry for users who might find Bitcoin too complex or intimidating.


2. Price Stability

Unlike Bitcoin, whose volatility makes it impractical for everyday transactions, stablecoins are pegged to fiat currencies like the US dollar. This stability allows people to use stablecoins for payments, savings, and remittances without worrying about fluctuating value.


3. Scalability

Most stablecoins operate on scalable blockchains, enabling them to process thousands of transactions per second at minimal cost. This scalability contrasts sharply with Bitcoin’s limited throughput and high transaction fees.


4. Global Adoption

Stablecoins are increasingly used for cross-border payments and remittances. For example, in countries with unstable local currencies, people are turning to stablecoins as a way to preserve value and access the global economy.


Bitcoin’s Pivot: From Cash to Digital Gold

Over the years, Bitcoin has shifted its narrative from “peer-to-peer cash” to “digital gold.” This pivot reflects Bitcoin’s strengths as a store of value rather than a medium of exchange. It is now seen as a hedge against inflation, a decentralized reserve asset, and a long-term investment.

While this pivot has attracted institutional investors and high-net-worth individuals, it has disappointed early adopters who envisioned Bitcoin as a tool for everyday financial empowerment. Bitcoin’s current utility is closer to that of gold: a valuable, immutable asset—but not something you use to buy coffee.


Decentralization Trade-Off: Stablecoins vs. Bitcoin

The one area where stablecoins fall short compared to Bitcoin is decentralization. Bitcoin’s decentralized nature makes it censorship-resistant and immune to government control. Stablecoins, being issued by centralized entities, are subject to regulatory oversight and potential censorship.

However, for many everyday users, this trade-off is acceptable. Most people prioritize convenience, stability, and low fees over full decentralization. As a result, stablecoins are emerging as the preferred choice for practical applications like payments and remittances.


Are Stablecoins the New Bitcoin?

Stablecoins are not a direct replacement for Bitcoin, but they are fulfilling the promises Bitcoin originally made—cheap, fast, and stable payments—far more effectively. Here’s how they compare:

  • Bitcoin: A store of value and a decentralized asset, ideal for those seeking financial sovereignty and long-term wealth preservation.
  • Stablecoins: A practical medium of exchange, ideal for everyday payments, remittances, and financial inclusion.

Together, Bitcoin and stablecoins form complementary parts of the broader digital asset ecosystem. Bitcoin remains the backbone of the crypto economy, while stablecoins are emerging as the backbone of digital payments.


Challenges Ahead for Stablecoins

Despite their advantages, stablecoins face significant challenges:

  1. Regulation: Governments are scrutinizing stablecoins due to their potential to disrupt traditional finance and monetary policy. Increased regulation could stifle innovation or limit their use.
  2. Centralization Risks: Stablecoins depend on the trustworthiness of their issuers. A failure or scandal involving a major stablecoin could damage the entire ecosystem.
  3. Competition from CBDCs: Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) could offer similar benefits with government backing, potentially diminishing the appeal of private stablecoins.

Conclusion: Stablecoins as the Future of Everyday Finance

For everyday users seeking cheap, instant, and stable payments, stablecoins are the clear winner. They have succeeded where Bitcoin has faltered, providing a practical solution for peer-to-peer electronic cash. While Bitcoin has transitioned to being a store of value, stablecoins are looking increasingly likely to take center stage as the digital currency of choice for global payments.

In the end, perhaps stablecoins and Bitcoin are not adversaries but allies in the broader mission to revolutionize finance. Bitcoin represents financial sovereignty and long-term value, while stablecoins offer the practicality and stability needed for everyday use. Together, they are shaping the future of money (much to the horror of early Bitcoiners).

Related Reading:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *