The cryptocurrency space is expanding faster than ever. With each new Bitcoin cycle, the market sees the emergence of yet another batch of Layer 1 blockchains, each promising faster speeds, cheaper transactions, or some new architectural breakthrough.
But do these new blockchains truly add value to the ecosystem, or are they simply diluting the market? Are they solving real problems, or are they just creating more noise in an already crowded space?
In this post, we’ll explore how the proliferation of Layer 1 chains impacts the broader crypto market. From the dilution of capital and liquidity to the increasingly extractive tokenomics of new chains, let’s dive into whether these new players are a net positive—or if they’re holding the industry back.
The Dilution Problem: Finite Resources in an Expanding Market
Finite Capital and Attention
The cryptocurrency industry operates within clear limits: there’s only so much user interest, institutional capital, and developer focus to go around. Every new Layer 1 chain competes for a slice of this pie, but as the number of competitors increases, the slices inevitably get smaller.
For users, this means fragmented ecosystems, where each chain has its own wallet requirements, tokens, and interfaces. For developers, it means difficult decisions about where to build and deploy their applications. And for investors, it means spreading liquidity thinner across an ever-growing list of platforms.
Fragmentation Hurts Growth
Unlike traditional networks, where growth in one area often benefits others (think of the internet’s network effects), new Layer 1 blockchains often function as isolated silos. This fragmentation prevents the ecosystem from achieving its full potential.
For example, Ethereum and Solana both have vibrant ecosystems, but they aren’t natively interoperable. Users and liquidity must rely on bridges—complex systems that introduce security risks and user friction. Each new Layer 1 adds another silo, further splintering the market.
If the crypto industry is to achieve mainstream adoption, it needs to focus on unifying ecosystems, not dividing them.
Extractive Tokenomics: The Latecomer’s Dilemma
Insider Bias and Token Distribution
One of the most concerning trends among new Layer 1 blockchains is their increasingly extractive tokenomics. Take Aptos, for instance: a significant percentage of its token supply is reserved for insiders—founders, early investors, and the foundation itself. By the time tokens reach retail investors, a disproportionate share of value has already been captured by insiders.
This creates an uneven playing field. While early participants benefit from massive allocations at low costs, retail investors are left buying tokens at inflated valuations, often with little upside.
Inflation and Price Suppression
Many new Layer 1s rely on staking to secure their networks, but staking rewards come with a cost: inflation. As staking mechanisms issue new tokens, the circulating supply grows faster than demand, putting downward pressure on prices.
Even if the market cap of a blockchain appears to grow, this inflationary dynamic often suppresses token prices, leaving latecomers holding the bag. The result? A system that extracts more value than it creates for the average investor.
Diminishing Returns on Innovation
What Are New Chains Adding?
Blockchains like Solana are already fast enough, cheap enough, and scalable enough for most use cases. So, what are new chains like Aptos or Sui actually adding?
The answer often lies in marginal improvements: slightly better transaction speeds, parallel processing, or other technical tweaks. But for most users, these differences are negligible. What matters more is a blockchain’s ecosystem—its liquidity, developer activity, and real-world use cases.
Launching a new Layer 1 with marginal benefits doesn’t necessarily solve user needs. Instead, it fragments the market further, drawing resources away from established ecosystems that are already capable of delivering value.
What Users and Developers Actually Want
Most users don’t care whether a blockchain can process 65,000 transactions per second or 100,000. They care about usability:
- Can I access DeFi easily?
- Are transaction fees predictable and affordable?
- Are my assets secure and interoperable across platforms?
Similarly, developers prioritize ecosystems with robust tooling, active communities, and liquidity. Established platforms like Ethereum (with Layer 2s) and Solana already meet these needs, making it harder for new Layer 1s to attract meaningful adoption.
The Saturation Problem: Too Many Chains, Not Enough Users
User and Developer Fatigue
The explosion of Layer 1 blockchains creates decision fatigue. Users are expected to navigate multiple wallets, bridges, and ecosystems, while developers must choose where to deploy their applications. This constant churn fragments attention and makes it harder for any single platform to achieve critical mass.
Many developers stick to established chains, where they can leverage existing infrastructure and user bases. Meanwhile, smaller and newer chains struggle to attract sustained interest.
Liquidity Fragmentation
As more Layer 1s enter the market, liquidity—the lifeblood of crypto—becomes increasingly fragmented. DeFi protocols on newer chains often suffer from low liquidity, making them less efficient and less attractive to users.
Interoperability solutions like Cosmos and Polkadot aim to address this issue, but adoption has been slow. Until these solutions are widely implemented, fragmentation will remain a major obstacle to growth.
What the Next Layer 1 Should Actually Solve
If new Layer 1 blockchains are to justify their existence, they need to offer more than incremental improvements. Here’s what they should focus on:
Radical Scalability
Solve not just today’s scalability issues but also prepare for global adoption. A truly scalable blockchain should handle billions of users without sacrificing decentralization or security.
True Decentralization
Move away from insider-biased tokenomics and create fair, community-driven networks. Decentralization isn’t just a buzzword—it’s a core value of blockchain technology.
Interoperability by Default
New blockchains should be designed with interoperability in mind, ensuring seamless compatibility with existing ecosystems. This would reduce fragmentation and increase network effects.
Mass Adoption Features
Focus on user experience: better wallets, simpler onboarding, and integration with real-world applications. The next billion users won’t be crypto-native—they need intuitive, accessible solutions.
Conclusion: Does the Crypto Ecosystem Need Every New Chain?
Each new Layer 1 blockchain claims to bring something revolutionary, but many add little more than marginal improvements. Instead of expanding the ecosystem, they often dilute it, splitting attention, liquidity, and resources.
To achieve its full potential, the crypto industry must prioritize consolidation, interoperability, and sustainable innovation. The question isn’t how many Layer 1s we can create—but how many we truly need.
The answer might not be “more.” It might be “better.”
Related Reading: