Over the past few years, a seductive idea has taken root in financial and crypto circles:
What if we could combine the ancient security of gold with the instant, borderless power of blockchain?
Imagine gold you could send across the world in seconds. Imagine fractional ownership, seamless settlement, and unstoppable custody — all backed by physical metal stored safely in a vault.
This is the dream of international tokenised gold. And on the surface, it sounds like the perfect solution for an increasingly unstable financial world.
But scratch a little deeper, and very serious problems start to appear.
Problems so fundamental that they threaten to undermine the entire premise.
Because in truth, tokenised gold does not free us from old vulnerabilities — it simply repackages them in digital form.
And in doing so, it may actually introduce new and even more dangerous risks.
In this article, we’ll dig into the very major issues hidden beneath the shiny surface of international tokenised gold — and why anyone serious about sovereignty, financial security, or freedom should be extremely cautious before embracing it.
1. Centralised Custody = No Real Sovereignty
Despite being issued as “blockchain tokens,” most current tokenised gold offerings — such as PAXG (Paxos Gold) and XAUt (Tether Gold) — rely on centralised custodians to hold the physical gold backing the tokens.
These custodians, typically operating under US or other Western regulatory jurisdictions, can freeze, confiscate, or restrict access to the underlying gold at any time, based on regulatory orders, political demands, or even their own business risk considerations.
Thus, ownership of a tokenised gold asset is not the same as actual control over the gold. The custodian — and ultimately, the state — holds the real power.
If you don’t control the vault, you don’t control the gold.
2. Tokenised Gold Is Vulnerable to Government Confiscation
History is full of examples where governments have confiscated private gold holdings during crises. Tokenised gold only makes confiscation easier:
- Governments can simply order custodians to freeze certain accounts.
- Blockchain records can be used to identify and target holders instantly.
- Executive actions, sanctions, and emergency laws can override any presumed legal protections.
Even Americans, supposedly protected by strong property rights, have precedent for gold confiscation (e.g., Executive Order 6102 in 1933).
In a real crisis, token holders would have no meaningful recourse.
3. No Mathematical or Cryptographic Verifiability
A key strength of Bitcoin and decentralised finance is mathematical verifiability: anyone can independently confirm supply, ownership, and transaction history.
Tokenised gold does not have this feature:
- You must trust that the gold is physically present.
- You must trust that it hasn’t been leased out, encumbered, or double-counted.
- You must trust audits — which can be delayed, limited, manipulated, or simply wrong.
There is no cryptographic proof that your token is genuinely and unconditionally backed by real gold.
Thus, tokenised gold operates entirely on trust — ironically, the very weakness blockchain technology was designed to eliminate.
4. Fragmentation: National Silos Instead of a Global Market
In theory, tokenised gold could enable a seamless, international market for gold ownership and settlement.
In practice, it is likely to fragment:
- Each country may insist on gold tokens backed by local storage, local regulation, and local issuers.
- Foreign gold tokens may be treated with suspicion, banned, or blocked.
- Liquidity would be fractured across national lines, destroying much of the global promise of tokenised gold.
Thus, cross-border interoperability would be minimal or non-existent.
Instead of a global gold market, we would end up with a patchwork of incompatible local token ecosystems.
5. Tokenised Gold Could Be Excluded from Payment and Financial Systems
Even if technically available, tokenised gold could become practically useless:
- Governments can forbid banks and fintechs from integrating or processing tokenised gold.
- Payment apps, neobanks, and digital wallets could be pressured or regulated into exclusion.
- Merchants could be discouraged or banned from accepting payments in gold tokens.
In such an environment, even if you own tokenised gold, you might not be able to spend it, use it, or even trade it easily.
The tokenised gold could become trapped within walled gardens of specialist exchanges.
6. Lack of Practical Access to Physical Gold
If users lost trust in tokenised gold, they could, in theory, sell tokens for fiat and buy physical gold.
In practice:
- Most of the world’s population has no easy access to trustworthy gold dealers.
- Buying physical gold often involves high premiums, verification risks, and logistics challenges.
- Safe storage is expensive and technically challenging, especially for small holders.
Thus, for most people, switching to physical gold is not a realistic backup plan.
Once trapped in a failed tokenised gold ecosystem, the exit options would be few and risky.
7. Gold Is Politically Sensitive and Will Remain So
Gold is not just a store of value — it is a strategic asset.
In times of economic turmoil, currency crises, or geopolitical conflict, gold becomes a tool of statecraft and national survival.
Thus, tokenised gold — especially in international circulation — will attract the full force of political, regulatory, and military attention.
It would be naive to think that governments would sit back and allow truly sovereign, unstoppable, borderless gold to circulate freely outside their control.
In fact, tokenised gold may be one of the first casualties in any future financial or geopolitical crisis.
Conclusion: Tokenised Gold Is a Mirage of Sovereignty
While international tokenised gold is an exciting concept on the surface, it ultimately fails to deliver on its core promises.
Instead of true sovereignty, it offers:
- Centralised custody,
- Government vulnerability,
- Trust-based verification,
- Fragmented liquidity,
- Limited usability, and
- Political fragility.
In a world increasingly marked by financial repression, regulatory overreach, and geopolitical tension, tokenised gold may offer little real security and may, in fact, amplify risks instead of mitigating them.
Anyone considering exposure to tokenised gold should think very carefully about who controls the gold, who can seize it, and whether ownership rights are real or merely theoretical.
Ownership without control is not ownership at all.
Explore More:
Leave a Reply